I had another conversation yesterday with a financial advisor about bitcoin and crypto in 401(k) plans, a subject on which I have written skeptically in the past. As I am wont to do, I again questioned whether the hunger to add crypto to defined contribution plans is in employees’ best interest, or whether instead
A New and Thoughtful Decision Awarding Fees Under ERISA to a Prevailing Party
Attorney fee awards under ERISA loom larger in the imagination of lawyers and, to the extent they note it at all, the public than they do in the real world. It’s likely due to the outsize coverage that the occasional very large fee award, usually entered as part of a class action settlement, receives in
On the Relationship Between Runaway Juries and Insurer Bad Faith
So there is an interesting article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on the rise of so-called “nuclear” verdicts in Massachusetts, or in other words, what we used to just call – with much less hyperbole – runaway jury verdicts. (By the way, can we do away with the marketing campaign to label large verdicts nuclear; runaway
Why Plan Sponsors Should Allow Independent Fiduciaries to Manage Employer Stock in Retirement Plans
I am quoted in an excellent article in Pensions & Investments by Robert Steyer on the use of independent fiduciaries when providing employer stock in company retirement plans. As many of you probably know, the Supreme Court’s decision a few years back in Fifth Third Bancorp vs. Dudenhoeffer raised the pleading bar substantially for plaintiffs
Sausages, Hamburgers, Target Date Funds and Crypto
This is a great article by Chris Carosa in Forbes, on the history of developing business by inventing a new subcategory in an existing field and then filling it. Although the article is in Forbes, Chris is probably better known as the force behind the retirement industry publication Fiduciary News, which to my recollection,
Is It a Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Include Target Date Funds In 401(k) Plans?
Not long after I first started writing this blog, the Seventh Circuit began trying to preemptively squelch excessive fee litigation by, at heart, insisting that the invisible hand of the market would never have allowed the type of overcharging of fees claimed by the plaintiffs in those cases and that plan fiduciaries therefore could not
How Should Courts Analyze Arbitration Clauses in ERISA Plans?
Here’s an excellent client alert, out of Holland and Knight, on the question of mandatory arbitration provisions in ERISA benefit plans. The alert discusses a recent federal district court decision out of Arizona requiring the participant in an ESOP to arbitrate her claim, rather than bring a putative class action case in federal court,
A Few Thoughts On Litigation Over Executive Retention and Departure
One of my partners, Mark Poerio, an expert on executive compensation, has written a client alert discussing what companies can consider doing proactively to encourage executives to stick around rather than move onto greener pastures. In short, they are all different ways to make the current position “greener,” so to speak, than competing pastures.
Did the Massachusetts Appeals Court Just Demand that Insurers Up Their Game When It Comes to Investigating Claims?
There is an interesting new decision by the Massachusetts Appeals Court concerning the liability of insurers under Massachusetts law for wrongful failure to settle a claim. Under the Massachusetts rubric, an insurer has an obligation to make at least reasonable efforts to settle a claim against its insured once the insured’s liability has become reasonably
When Does An Insured Have to Reimburse Its Insurer for Amounts Paid by the Insurer On a Claim?
Well, this is something. I think the partner who mentored me as a junior associate and I started reserving insurers’ rights to recover defense costs back from insureds if the claim at issue turned out to be uncovered thirty years ago – and someone has finally convinced a Massachusetts court to order an insured to