In earlier posts in my Plan Sponsor and Fiduciary 2.0 series I promised to provide a cheat sheet for fiduciaries confronting the push to add private equity and other alternative assets to 401(k) plans. Here it is, with a focus on private equity assets, because that is where most of the initial action currently is
Many commentators are suggesting that the recent executive order and the directive for regulatory action towards adding private equity and other alternative assets to 401(k) plans does not mean that those assets are destined to end up in 401(k) plans. But personally, I think that belief is almost certainly naïve – particularly with regard to
This is the third in my series of posts called Plan Sponsor and Fiduciary 2.0, which addresses how fiduciaries and plan sponsors should now be conducting themselves in light of operational changes, legal developments, and liability risks that have developed over the past ten to fifteen years. You can find the origin story behind this
One of the themes I have returned to time and again with regard to excessive fee and other class action litigation under ERISA is that the traditional litigation approach deployed for years by the plan sponsor community needs to be updated. With some variation, it has followed the traditional defense model typically used in class
Walk softly and carry a big stick. Trust but verify. Never bring a knife to a gunfight.
People who know me, have read my blog regularly, heard me speak on ERISA issues, or been on a jury in a case I have tried, know that I am very fond of analogies, metaphors, short examples, and
I wanted to quickly pass along, with a couple of comments, this excellent blog post by Scott Galbreath of Trucker Huss on a recent Ninth Circuit decision on interpreting and applying releases of ERISA claims executed by employees. As the post points out, the Ninth Circuit adopted the tests of other circuits, including the First
A recent discussion with a colleague in the insurance industry (who shall remain nameless so as to protect the innocent) caused me to crystalize some of my inchoate thinking on how current problems in ERISA class action litigation, including too many suits, too much defense spending, too much self-protective caution on the part of plan
Because I really like lawyering, I am pleased that I have had a very busy and productive February, full of client meetings, filings in courts in various jurisdictions, and interesting work. The drawback, though, is that it is now almost the end of the second month of 2025 and I still haven’t finished my countdown
Some things are just evergreen when it comes to ERISA, a point that is driven home whenever, as now, I publish my top ten most read blog posts of the prior year. The Supreme Court just returned, for about the umpteenth time, to the subject of excessive fee class action litigation and the question
This is a really good day to be returning to my countdown of the top ten most read blog posts of 2024, because just yesterday, the Supreme Court returned to a central issue in ERISA class action and excessive fee litigation: namely, what are the pleading standards and how can they be used