Here’s an interesting article on one particular aspect of ERISA breach of fiduciary duty cases, namely the targeting as defendants of executive officers of the company sponsoring a pension or 401(k) plan; the gist of the article is that there are tactical and psychological benefits that accrue to counsel representing plan participants when they name
Fiduciaries
More on that Grand Irony Theory
Does the fact pattern below allow for a remedy under ERISA, particularly as the Sereboff/equitable relief line of cases has been interpreted in the First Circuit to date?
The plaintiff employee says that she purchased a life insurance policy on her husband through her employer’s group coverage. When her husband was dying, she resigned
…
Roundup at the LaRue Corral
Thoughts on the Oral Argument in LaRue v. DeWolf, Boberg
Just read the transcript of Monday’s oral argument in LaRue, which you too can read right here. Interesting argument, and interesting lines of questions from the court, although I am skeptical as to how much guidance as to the court’s thinking one can draw from the Justice’s questions themselves. In many ways, the…
LaRue v DeWolff, Broberg and the Concept of Administration Risk in ERISA Plans
By Stephen Rosenberg on
Oral argument at the Supreme Court is scheduled for Monday in LaRue v DeWolff, Broberg & Associates, which presents the technical question of whether a loss to only one participant’s 401(k) plan is actionable as a breach of fiduciary duty causing a loss to the plan, but which on a broader level concerns the…
ERISA, Subprime Lending and Mortgage Meltdown
By Stephen Rosenberg on
Posted in Fiduciaries
One of the great things about writing this blog is that the technology of blogging – like links to other blogs and so-called trackbacks, showing who else on the internet is quoting a post – brings writers, topics and other bloggers onto my radar screen who I would otherwise miss out on. That cumbersome, semi-tech…
A Primer on Fiduciary Status Under ERISA
By Stephen Rosenberg on
Posted in ERISA Statutory Provisions, Fiduciaries
I liked the recent opinion in Bonilla v. Bella Vista Hospital, Inc., out of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (not available online from the court, but here’s a Lexis cite for it: 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79939) for really only one reason, namely this terrific overview of the law of…
Is Subprime the New Stock Drops?
By Stephen Rosenberg on
The consensus in the legal community, and I don’t think it is just because they are looking hopefully for a new flow of work, has for awhile now been that fund investment losses resulting from exposure to the subprime mortgage mess will eventually generate substantial ERISA related litigation. There are plenty of avenues for these…
ERISA, Investment Strategies and the Duty to Investigate
By Stephen Rosenberg on
ERISA litigation, particularly in the area of retirement benefits, is one of those areas of the law that can be particularly complicated because both the governing body of law and the underlying fact pattern to which it is applied can be tremendously complex. Take, for instance, the example of disputes over whether the fiduciaries of…
Determining Fiduciary Status: And the Computer Says . . .
By Stephen Rosenberg on
Posted in Fiduciaries
Fiduciary status is the touchstone of the law of ERISA. From that status flows many of the obligations that ERISA can impose on a party, as well as extensive potential liability. For those of you wondering about who is a fiduciary and when for these purposes, Susan Mangiero has found a really fun (well, if…